A philosophical construct I subscribe to, and circular/spherical infinity relatively illustrates, is the term "absolute relativity", which basically means everything is relative to itself and interconnected. This may seem paradoxical but, regarding the seeming apparent contradiction between the absoluteness of "all is relative", consider that the absolute can, in theory, only exist in whole (monism) only if everything within (relative to) that whole is relative to everything else (also relative to that whole)--"absolute relativity".
Other visual representations of absolute relativity could be:
- A number of points all connected to each other (such as a 12-vertex complete graph--see image at right). However, this can lead to a sort of "fractal absolute relativity" in which, simply by zooming in or out on the "contained absolute relativity", can result in nested absolute relativities (like circular/spherical infinity).
- Enclosing a circle ( ) with a larger square touching the circle's outsides [( )], then enclosing the square with a larger circle touching the square's corners ([( )]), and so on infinitely.
- I would think this concept applies to all self-similar patterns (fractals).
The contradiction of "absolute relativity" appears and disappears relative to the extent at which the concept is understood (related to). It works if you think about it...and understand it. Such is the nature of nature to be and not be a paradox.
Put another way, base-2 circular/spherical infinity can be seen as dualistic or monistic depending on one's perception and focus. If focusing on the inner circles, a duality appears but if the inner circles are seen as being a part of the larger circle (since the circles continue infinitely outward as well), a monism appears. Hence, circular infinity is both monistic and dualistic at the same time.
Perhaps the most obvious application is of a cycle--specifically, embedded cycles such as units of time and orders of magnitude
Planck time -> attoseconds -> femtoseconds -> picoseconds -> nanoseconds -> microseconds -> milliseconds -> centiseconds -> deciseconds -> seconds -> minutes -> hours -> days -> weeks -> months -> years -> decades -> centuries -> millenia -> (periods -> eras -> eons -> etc.)
60 -> 60 -> 24 -> 7 -> 4 -> 12 -> 10 -> 100 -> 1,000 -> 10,000 -> 100,000 -> 1,000,000 -> etc.
So, if the outer circle is a millenium (1000 years), then 10 circles inside it are the centuries (100 years), 10 more circles on the next level for decades (10 years), etc. Granted, the circles won't divide perfectly because of the different base divisions so some relative conversions will have to be made.